S5. Ep. 5
Liz Davis

Date

November 22, 2022

Time

20 minutes

Category

Amplify Inclusion Podcast

Share

Welcome to Amplify Inclusion, a podcast where we share authentic stories of inclusion in action.

Liz Davis, UX (User Experience) Designer, shares her personal story and how it has informed her approach to creating accessible technology. Listen now or view the full transcript below. To access closed captions, you must be logged into a Podbean user account.

Related Resources: Liz Does Design | Web Accessibility Initiative

This episode was co-produced and engineered by Subframe Sound with music courtesy of Nealle DiPaolo. This season is made possible thanks to generous support from the Fred J. Brunner Foundation, Enterprise Fleet Management, First Bank Chicago and members of the Aspire community.


Full Transcript

(light music) 

Clare 00:02 

Welcome to Amplify Inclusion. I’m Clare from the nonprofit, Aspire. Thanks for joining us for  stories and conversation about disability inclusion. Today we’re wrapping up the season with the  focus on digital accessibility. My guest is Liz Davis, a user experience or UX Designer at  Bounteous. Liz has been a problem-solver since birth. She’s been a UX designer for over five  years, and her life with a disability offers a unique perspective on design. I recently spoke with  Liz to learn more about her story, and how it has informed her approach to creating accessible  technology. Here’s our conversation. Liz, thank you so much for joining me today. 

Liz 00:46 

Thank you for having me. This is very exciting. 

Clare 00:49 

Yes, agreed. And it’s such an important topic that we’re going to be talking about today, we’re  gonna dive into digital accessibility and thinking about how tech and access are interconnected.  This is such a big topic, right? So we’re just gonna barely scratch the surface today.  

Liz 01:07 

Yeah. 

Clare 01:07 

Especially when we’re thinking about an increasingly virtual world, usability for all people has,  it’s really never been more important than it is now. 

Liz 01:16 

Oh, for sure. And that increasing the divide further with technology between disability, it’s like,  we’re at the beginning of a new tech era, and making sure that we don’t increase that divide.  Instead, we use the tech to help bridge the divide.  

Clare 01:32 

Yeah, I think that’s a great way to put it, it’s a time for opportunity. So, I want to get into more  about user experience and digital access in just a second. But first, I just want people to get to  know you a bit. So I’d love to just start off by hearing more about you. I understand you were 

born with your disability, and you’ve been a wheelchair user your whole life. So tell me more  about your story. 

Liz 01:54 

Sure, yeah, I grew up in kind of rural Illinois setting. Most of my life, I was sort of the first  instance people would run into with the disability, especially a physical one. And so that kind of  influenced how I presented myself as a disabled person. And then recognize- using that to  recognize, inherently like these biases in our surrounding environments, right? Like, so  recognizing from an early age that maybe this environment isn’t made for you, especially when  you have physical disability, you’re like- Oh, well, I physically can’t get into a space. You know,  even as a kid, you’re kind of like- Oh, yeah, I recognize this as a problem. And so that’s kind of  like the background knowledge of what built my, I would say, my empathy as a designer, and  my understanding of systems as a designer. So understanding, understanding systemic levels  at a way, kids might not at a young age, just inherently by being a wheelchair user. Right? So  I’ve always had this tool to rely on. And one of the biggest things that my growing up  experience, I would say, is not having a lot of disability role models in my life. Which, you know,  when I was younger, I didn’t feel like was a huge deal. You know, I had other role models, or  perhaps the younger me was like- I don’t need role models. And then as I got older and met  more folks with disabilities, and moved to Chicago and found a great community there,  understanding how my own view of disability was warped into this more ablest views than I had  anticipated, and how I’ve grown from connecting with other disabled community members, and  how much that has impacted me in a way that I wouldn’t have thought of years ago, you know.  So, still on that journey, personally, but still much further in that journey than I was. So, using my  platform as a designer, and in general to talk about how disability and technology interact. Even  if it doesn’t directly impact me, it’s still a passion in that way. Because you realize- I’ve realized  how much others have done advocacy for me in the physical world, and how I can help others  with accessibility and technology. 

Clare 03:54 

You know, when you and I spoke before him, you mentioned a local leader here in Chicago,  Karen Tamely, yeah, who you had a connection with. Tell me more about what that meant to  you meeting Karen. 

Liz 04:06 

Yeah. And actually, we can, we can relate that back to technology too, because one of the big  drivers of technology is community and communication. And one of the big things is more  disabled people can talk to each other online more. And I on a whim, joined a disability group on  Facebook, in 2014ish, 2015ish. That was for my specific disability. And through that Facebook  group, I met Karen Tamely, who is a leader in Chicago. She’s now the president of Access  Living, and she’s wonderful, and we have the same disability. And she took the time to, like,  meet with me and introduce me and I don’t know if she meant to be a role model, but you know,  was a role model for me and motivated me to pursue a lot of things, like helped open that door  to a wider community and like, that’s a good example of how technology can be a positive. It  probably changed the whole trajectory of where I was going at the time, just to know all these  things existed. And meet someone disabled who I felt similarly to and felt a connection to. 

Clare 05:05 

Yeah, I think that’s a great way to put it. Because, you know, when we’re thinking about how  tech access is for everyone, let’s think about the new gateways new pathways that a virtual 

world has opened up, like community building that you’re just you’re mentioning now, and just  another reinforcement for why we have to think about accessibility and making sure everybody  can make those community connections this way.  

Liz 05:28 

Yeah.  

Clare 05:28 

You mentioned that as a wheelchair user, from your perspective, it allowed you to notice where  there were a lot of gaps in user access. So I wonder, you know, can you share some examples  as a wheelchair user? What are some things you’ve- you ran into in terms of tech inaccessibility,  and navigating the world? 

Liz 05:47 

I’ll bucket it in the two- I usually think of it in two instances. And the first bucket, so to speak,  would be kind of what is still technology, but maybe not what we think of in technology, like, for  example, an elevator is technology. But when we’re saying ‘Tech’, we usually don’t mean  elevators. Like anything like that is like the first wave of technology and seeing how inaccessible  some of those things are kind of gives us a preview of the newer generation of technology,  whereas tech becomes more involved in our lives. And so early part of my life, realizing that not  everything has an elevator. Like a big thing when I was younger was my mother made them put  an elevator in our middle school, because they didn’t want to do that. They want to just put me  always on the ground floor, which is not good for social inclusion. It’s a whole different topic. But  that’s a good preview of like, what could happen with current technology. And so growing up  with those experiences, and being like, well, you know, most places don’t even have button  doors, anyway, next time you go to a gas station, just notice how pretty much every gas station  never has buttons. And it’s kind of with that assumption that disabled people don’t drive. At least  that’s what it tells me. Seeing that stuff in the environment and being like- Well, they obviously  didn’t think about me or consider me in this environment. 

Clare 06:59 

People often when they think of tech accessibility, they’re thinking about, you know, a computer  on your desktop or your laptop. And they’re thinking about website design. But when we’re  thinking about user experience, there are computers and machines everywhere, right? So to  help people get in that mindset, can you first help us set the stage with maybe some digital  access terms? Let’s start there. And then let’s talk about what are some of those different  computers that exists in our world. 

Liz 07:31 

So we’re going to kind of move into that second bucket of tech I’m talking about, which is sort of  like you’re not thinking about elevators or automatic buttons or, you know, older technology, but  things like kiosks, or digital interaction to like, do things as mundane as pay for your parking  ticket, or place orders in restaurants, or even technology in conferences, or mobile apps, like it’s  that type of wide next generation, application of technology that is kind of the field that’s up and  coming that people think of when you say technology, or ‘tech’, the tech industry. One of the  things we’ve talked about defining is what UX is. And UX is short for user experience. And user  experience is like the big umbrella of how people interact with technology, and how we structure  and design things. Whether it’s an app, a website, a kiosk, a sidewalk even, all that is into this  field called UX. And it’s how we design how people interact with it and how we make it easier, or 

sometimes harder for them to use. And so in this context, usually we’re going to be talking about  UX is like the user experience of, of an app itself. So the buttons you use, the interfaces you  use, and how we think about those things and what, how we design them, because it’s  important to remember that every piece of technology you interact with, has been designed for  someone. And if you can’t interact with it, it’s probably because it’s not designed with you in  mind. And as a UX person and a disabled person. It’s that I see so many users that blame  themselves, when they can’t use something. And having both identities there and being like, it’s  not your fault. It’s whoever made this’s fault. And you see this a lot with older folks as well, or  they blame themselves for not being able to use technology. And a good UX person is going to  be like, it’s not you, it’s the interface. We’re not our users. We’re hired to help them. And that’s a  good mantra to think about UX. 

Clare 09:26 

That’s great, Liz, because, you know, it made me think of the Social Model of Disability, right?  And how do we flip that- it’s not the person’s problem, it’s the environment. It’s the tool. 

Liz 09:37 

Yeah. And you, you know, honestly, when I first learned about the social model of disability, you  know, that there was a model of disability and there was one called the social model. And when  I read that definition, I almost like fell over because I was like, this is UX. And I remember like  looking around like, there’s no one around me and I’m reading this in some like alone on a  computer, I’m like- this is UX! 

Clare 09:58 

The way you described it perfectly really mirrored that. And I think that’s a good connection for  people to make.  

Liz 10:04 

Yes 

Clare 10:04 

Because it gives some make- creates some accountability too, right? 

Liz 10:08 

Exactly like everything in our environment is made- roads, buildings, everything is designed by  someone, and those designers and who practition, those things should be responsible for  making sure that we think of who’s going to be using them. And when we relate it to disability,  you know, we think about how the medical model for so many kids, and I say kids, because it  was myself included, how much emphasis as a kid growing up in the 90s was about walking,  and how important it was to walk and be normal, to the point where I would like, almost verbally  fight with my mother about going to physical therapy, because I didn’t like it. And it was this idea  that you had to fit into that model of ‘normal’, which is the medical model. You have to learn to  use the thing and be the way it dictates then you realize the social model, which is like it’s okay  if she just uses her wheelchair, because that’s what’s easiest. And if she can’t get somewhere  with her wheelchair, it’s because they need a ramp, or would they need to provide access. And  it shifts the responsibility from the individual to the environment, the society, or the application  itself. And that’s a big- makes you feel less alone, especially as a disabled person to realize that  it’s not your fault. And there’s no amount of gumption or grit, or effort you can put into 

overcoming that obstacle. It’s a community effort. It’s not on you as the individual, which I think  is a big game changer for a lot of disabled people. 

Clare 11:33 

I think something else important to note here is that access to technology is not mandated under  the Americans with Disabilities Act. 

Liz 11:42 

They’re not written into the Americans with Disability Act, which I think is a big misnomer that  some people have, because that came out in the 90s. And I wouldn’t call myself an expert on  this or a lawyer, but tech is not covered under that and in what we think of as tech now, because  it just didn’t exist in that same space. 

Clare 11:59 

So WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is that sort of the current like gold standard  for appearance? 

Liz 12:08 

Yeah, for especially regarding like screen-reader support, and the overview of like the technical  application of accessibility, that’s where anyone should direct most people to getting started on  what that means in the tech world. And they have different levels of accessibility in it. And they  

have different like guidelines, and they’re updating them constantly. It’s a collective of  professionals being like, this is the standard. And anyone who is good at accessibility will tell  you that no guidelines are perfect. And you need to test with people who are using the  technology. And anyone who says any different is wrong. You need to test with people too. 

Clare 12:47 

That’s a great tip. Because we yeah, we can create parameters informed by user experience.  But it has to be combined with that lived-experience perspective in real time, I think that’s really  important to note.  

Liz 12:59 

Yeah.  

Clare 12:59 

So, you started to talk a little bit about some great examples of things in our environment,  kiosks, self checkout, at restaurants, all these different ways we’re interacting with computers.  And I wondered if you could maybe give a couple examples of digital accessible features. So  you mentioned screen-reading as one way that someone can have greater access to tech, can  you give some examples of other ways that technology might be adapted for access,  

Liz 13:31 

For sure. So everyone has their own type of tools to access technology, and everyone takes  different approaches, right? You know, we have magnification of text. It’s one everyone can  relate to, like you just zoom-in the text on your phone- that’s an accessibility feature. Text-to-talk  is an accessibility feature. Being able to have text read to you is an accessibility feature. One  thing stands out to me too, is just using your phone with one hand and not having access to the  other hand, I would consider accessibility because not every app, if you look at your phone, you  can always manage with your just your thumb and one-handed, there’s people who only have 

one hand, just assume as a technology person, someone’s going to be accessing your tech with  something other than a mouse and keyboard. You can’t change yourself to fit something that  wasn’t built for you. 

Clare 14:17 

Well, and the things that you’re saying right now are making me connect back to some other  things you and I have talked about, which is sort of as you’ve started your career in the tech  world, noticing, not a lot of other people with disabilities, not a lot of other disabled folks in the  tech world, right? And those perspectives aren’t always at the table. So any insights there in  just thinking about some of the things you’ve noticed about representation in tech? 

Liz 14:36 

Yeah. Anyone can be disabled of any type of intersectional group. And so tech has a big  problem with that in general representation. And so when we focus just on disability, you know,  from my lens, I’ve very rarely worked with someone else in a wheelchair. And most likely not on  my direct team. I’ve worked in companies that had other wheelchair users to my knowledge, but  not someone on my direct team. So it’s always that lens of like, you come in primed to look for,  who are they leaving out? For me tech was a tech was a path to independence of like, I can do  this, you know, at the time “despite my disability,” and I can be successful because I naturally  thankfully had tech-leanings, for my skill-set. And when you kind of get that far, you’re like- Wait,  I thought everybody would have this idea, where are the other disabled people at? And then you  kind of break it down a little bit more and see how there are barriers in employment, in general  to disabled folk getting jobs. And so, it’s clear the structure of jobs, and how we hire and how we  think about having people on our team will leave out people with disabilities. And that is  something I noticed when I started working in tech, is there’s these perspectives of people who  are designing things, designing with your own biases, your own lens. You’re not gonna think  about someone like me who’s a little too short to reach the kiosk that you put on a counter to  check into a movie ticket place. And that was a big thing. I remember noticing and being very  passionate about and just sort of like a survival aspect of like, it starts out with like, I don’t want  to be left out on this. Oh, now I’m seeing ever- a lot of other people are being left out. And I’m  the one here. So let’s make sure everyone’s thinking about someone. 

Clare 16:37 

Yeah. And I mean, I would imagine, Liz that it’s probably somewhat conflicting for you at times  to be the voice at the table and being able to kind of share your lived experience and not  wanting the weight of being the perspective of the disability community, right. So is that  something that weighs on you?  

Liz 16:59 

It naturally felt easier to do that in the work environment, too. But it also means that, like, that’s  not me all the time. Right? Like, there are times especially if it’s a stressful week, or if it’s like, if I  speak up now, is my job position going to be in jeopardy? That’s the- that’s the other side of the  labor of like, not just being able to have the energy to say it, but do I have- how far can I push  and still be safe? And the other part of that is like, being the sole person in the workforce of- if I speak up about all these issues, am I going to be seen as a problem or an advocate? And I’ve  been very lucky in my career that I’ve been employed in places where that’s celebrated. But it’s  definitely not the case for everybody. And it’s probably hurt me in ways that I just don’t realize,  honestly. It’s a hard thing for people to confront their own biases when they’re like staring at  you. And sometimes people don’t want to deal with them. And tech is still in the sort of like, it’s, I 

would call ‘hustle culture.’ There’s an expectation that, overall, you need to work, work, work,  and get the job done. And I think some places are better than others about just overall  addressing, like the mental health of working, and are you working too much? Are you taking  breaks? Like places are realizing that now, which is great, but that it’s still a very tech-centric  view of like, productivity over people sometimes. And any employment place that’s really  focused on that could hurt their disabled employees more than they realize. Because we’re  already trying to usually keep up with what we view as normal based on what is not the  disabled-normal. And so it’s, it’s good to be aware of how that culture can impact disabled folks,  just in general.  

Clare 18:51 

Oh, yeah. I think that’s a great point, Liz. And it’s both your noting sort of an industry culture,  and then it zooms down to specific workplace culture, too, right, within companies.  

Liz 19:02 

Yeah.  

Clare 19:03 

And I wonder, in your work with people, with clients- what are some of the most commonly  overlooked aspects of digital access, or perhaps the roadblocks that you most often run into? 

Liz 19:17 

Hmm, yeah, I think that’s interesting, especially now, because accessibility is a very big topic in  our industry. And then you have to realize, like, there’s a whole community out there of people  that you’re not saving, you’re including, and that’s the big gap that the tech industry sometimes  

has, is this idea that using tech to save the world is kind of the backbone of this is like, your tech  is not saving someone your tech is including someone and that’s the same thing with  accessibility. And that’s a big roadblock. And so, tech is sometimes a lot of being like  accessibility first, which is great, because it used to you know, if you were asked me this a year  or two ago would have been like, accessibility coming in at the end is a huge overlooked aspect  as well. And I think the industry is becoming a little more smarter than that now, because it costs  so much money to go back and fix things. I’ve been in several projects or just aware of things in  the industry of like people who had to go back and like, make everything accessible because  they didn’t start out the beginning. 

Clare 20:21 

Let’s talk about that for a second. Because I’d love to leave people with some other tips you  would have for things, individuals or businesses- what can people do? 

Liz 20:32 

First, take a second, okay, and don’t try to solve everything at once. The second thing is, is  figure out what disability resource in your community you can contact, because that’s the  number one thing I see people doing wrong is they don’t even talk to people with disabilities.  They’re just like, we’re gonna make it accessible. And I’m like, Okay, have you ever spoken to a  disabled person and been aware of it? If the answer is no, start there! You know, start at  WCAG. Look for those guidelines, they’re a good source for starting to dig into that rabbit hole  of accessibility. And be wary of experts that promote quick save solutions. They say they can fix  something immediately. Don’t trust that. That’s kind of like our top three tips is like- talk to a  disabled person, look at the guidelines- start there, they have resources- and don’t trust 

anybody who says that they can fix it overnight. And those are the biggest problems I see in the  industry right now. 

Clare 21:34 

And I think that third one really does connect to what you were saying before with there has to  be forethought.  

Liz 21:39 

Yeah 

Clare 21:39 

It has to be prioritized in the planning process, or else we’re risking higher costs. More time,  right, more effort to be able to undo things rather than do them right the first time around.  

Liz 21:45 

Yeah. 

Clare 21:47 

Well, it’s been such a pleasure talking to you, Liz and getting to know you, I really enjoyed this  and just really appreciate the work that you do. It’s so important. And it’s- I kind of think of the  UX designer role as like the superhero kind of behind the screen. Because you know, it’s so  important, and your advocacy and your perspective is so important. And I’m hoping we can kind  of finish by hearing you give a little bit of a sort of a visual picture, like when you think of an  inclusive, usable tech-world. What does that look like to you? 

Liz 21:47 

Yeah. Yeah, I’ve been thinking about this a lot, honestly, because technology changes so  rapidly. And I think it’s sort of a myth to think something can be fully usable, and hit every case.  And that’s one of the cruxes that people fall into and get frustrated by. And so my, my actual  picture of a full usable tech-world is one where disabled people are part of that process. And  how that looks in the tech way is, there’s multiple ways to use things. And that is what I  imagined as a full usable tech world is something that gives me multiple ways to engage with it,  and multiple ways to adapt it to myself. 

Clare 23:07 

Thank you to my guest, Liz Davis. Today marks the final episode of our fifth season of Amplify  Inclusion. We look forward to bringing you all new episodes in the new year. Thank you for your  support, and for choosing to be a part of the inclusive movement with Aspire. Please stay  connected with us at AspireChicago.com And don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe to  Amplify Inclusion. This episode was co-produced and engineered by Subframe Sound. This  season is made possible thanks to generous support from the Fred J. Bruner Foundation,  Enterprise Fleet Management, Firstbank Chicago, and members of the Aspire community.

S6. Ep. 4<br>Emily Voorde

Amplify Inclusion Podcast

S6. Ep. 4
Emily Voorde

It’s the 30th episode of Amplify Inclusion! Emily Voorde, Founder and CEO of INTO Strategies, reflects on her journey of… Read More

S6. Ep. 3<br>Jordyn Zimmerman

Amplify Inclusion Podcast

S6. Ep. 3
Jordyn Zimmerman

Jordyn Zimmerman, nonspeaking autistic advocate, shares her personal experience and insights on inclusion and belonging. Check out the episode now… Read More

Amplify Inclusion Podcast

S6. Ep. 2
InfiniTeach | Aliyah, Ned & Katie

Welcome to Amplify Inclusion, a podcast where we share authentic stories of inclusion in action. Aliyah Rich, Ned Williams and Katie Hench… Read More

Aspire logo
arrow up
Be Included

Get news and events information.